UNLV 2 short peer review answer (

very casual writing, based on personal opinion

1) Operators now face a challenging situation due to the complexities between state and federal laws around cannabis legalization, especially in areas where following rules is crucial, including hospitality and gambling. There are additional levels of complication and uncertainty due to the clash between the federal classification of marijuana as a controlled narcotic and the many state-level legalization initiatives.

The position adopted by regulating agencies, including Nevada’s Gaming Control Board, is indicative of the balance in negotiating these complicated regulations. The strict ban on gaming license holders taking part in state medical marijuana programs, without a change in federal law, emphasizes the regulatory authorities’ dedication to maintaining current national standards despite state laws that are constantly changing.

Businesses like Colorado’s Sky Ute Casino have shown practicality in removing marijuana-related pre-employment tests, indicating a need to adjust to the current reality. This action recognizes that it can be challenging to recruit skilled workers who can pass standard drug tests, especially in areas where marijuana use is legal.

Updates to the law, like Nevada’s Assembly Bill 533, indicate a deliberate effort to bring cannabis laws closer to the gaming industry. Establishing specialized commissions signifies that tensions between these two changing sectors must be addressed and harmonized.

The traditionally strict position taken by the Gaming Control Board demonstrates a dedication to keeping a distinct division between the gaming and cannabis businesses. The decision to deny gaming licenses to those operating cannabis businesses highlights how important it is to protect the integrity of the gaming sector, even if it means being firm about possible conflicts.

Another layer of complexity is the impact of money laundering concerns on the division of the casino and cannabis businesses. The regulatory authorities have adopted a cautious stance, which is reflected in the increased monitoring of funding sources, particularly those associated with the cannabis industry.

The advice for operators to uphold a drug-free workplace culture compliant with state and federal legislation is a sensible and essential step in navigating this complicated legal landscape. A strategy designed to tackle the obstacles presented by the changing legal landscape must include regular assessments, legal compliance audits, and remaining up-to-date on advancements in cannabis law. Enforcing these regulations and providing managers with comprehensive training is essential for guaranteeing equitable and efficient handling of issues about employee cannabis use.

2-3 sentences of feedback on this

2) I agree that a flexible strategy is vital to handle the sophisticated regulations in the casino industry. Marijuana laws are changing rapidly, and even if they become legal nationwide, the decision to eliminate pre-employment testing for marijuana should be made after careful consideration of all relevant factors. In this discussion, my top priority is guest and employee safety, and my second priority is the employee’s ability to perform the job if they use any addictive substances. I would rather not 100% eliminate pre-employment testing for marijuana, but I will set a standard threshold limit for an acceptable amount of marijuana to ensure employees will not be impaired at work. I may also set up workplace impairment policies and communicate clearly with every employee about expectations and consequences. This approach will focus on employees’ ability to perform their jobs effectively rather than their off-duty activities.