OPS400 Operations Management 4 page APA formated paper, Appendixes, 3 APA Citations

Question Description

Once selected as a tutor I will give further instructions as to how to access the Persons Lab

Recommended

Additional Resources

Module 5: Critical Thinking

  • Points100
  • Submittinga file upload

Critical Thinking Assignment (100 Points)

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Donot do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the titleof your submission.

Common Instructions for both Options #1 and #2: Operations Quality Management

  1. Access the Pearson MyOMLab per the instructions located in theCourse Information folder, titled: MyOMLab Student Guide. Carefullyreview the simulation’s introductory information and instructions, asthese results will influence your grade by 10%. After completing thesimulation, capture a screen image of your final simulation results,which are to be included in your critical thinking operations managementassignment as an appendix item.

The operations quality management assignment content must include the following:

  • Introduction: Explain the purpose or thesis of thepaper and explain how the body of the paper is arranged to support thepurpose of the paper.
  • Provide a brief definition of operations quality management and identify why it is important in an organization’s operations.
  • Provide a brief overview description of the quality management simulation.
  • Describe your strategy for performing the quality management simulation.
  • Describe at least three operations quality management methods,principles, or techniques experienced in the quality managementsimulation.
  • Itemize at least three lessons learned from the quality management simulation.
  • Conclusion: Present a recap of key points and summary of main emphasis without repeating verbatim and exclusive of new information.
  • References: Include at least two current scholarly references (published within the past five years) in addition to the course text.
  • Appendix: Quality management simulation results. Theappendix page should be its own page after your reference page, with theheader: Appendix—with your screenshot below.

Submit your Critical Thinking assignment document(s) to the modulesubmissions area established for this purpose. Per the assignmentrubric, a portion of your evaluation is based on your simulationresults.

Option #1: Operations Quality Management Paper

This Critical Thinking assignment option consists of two activities:

  1. Performing the Pearson MyOMLab Forecasting Simulation, examining theresults, and identifying lessons learned. Please adhere to the detailedinstructions contained in the Common Instructions for both Options #1 and #2: Operations Quality Management
  2. A written operations management quality paper.
  • Your report will require a structure that includes a strong title,followed by an introductory paragraph which generates interest andincludes a thesis and mapping of what is to come.
  • Each of the sections should use appropriate APA headings, including a conclusion section.
  • Make sure that the body sections address each of the previous bullets.

Submission Requirements:

  • Your well-written paper should be three to four pages in length not including the required cover and references pages.
  • Support your paper with at least three scholarly references(excluding all textbooks). Use current sources, not older than fiveyears. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.
  • Format your paper according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).

Please adhere to the detailed instructions contained in the Common Instructions for both Options #1 and #2: Operations Quality Management section above.

Option #2: Operations Quality Management Presentation

This Critical Thinking assignment option consists of two activities:

  1. Performing the Pearson MyOMLab Quality Management Simulation.
  2. Creating a multimedia-rich operations quality management presentation.
  • Your multimedia-rich operations quality management presentation mustcontain logically-cohesive flow including audio, video, and graphicalcontent.
  • The length of the presentation, in addition to the title andreference portions, should be 10-12 slides (must include speaker notes),or five to seven minutes of narrated presentation (must include atranscript).
  • Please present your content clearly, concisely, and cohesively.
  • The presentation may be submitted as a completely self-containedfile (e.g., PowerPoint, Prezi, Screencast-o-matic, Knovio, or Loom) oras a link to a hosted internet site.

Please adhere to the detailed instructions contained in the Common Instructions for both Options #1 and #2: Operations Quality Management section above.

Rubric

OPS400 Mod 5 CT

OPS400 Mod 5 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements

10.0to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent

20.0to >16.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

16.0to >12.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

12.0to >8.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

8.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis

20.0to >16.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

16.0to >12.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

12.0to >8.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.

8.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOperations Quality Management Simulation Performance

20.0to >16.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Performed the entire simulation with a profit outcome at or above $350,000.

16.0to >12.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Performed the entire simulation with a profit outcome below $350,000 and at or above $330,000.

12.0to >8.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Performed the entire simulation with a profit outcome below $330,000 and at or above $300,000.

8.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Performed at least a portion of the simulation with a profit outcome below $300,000.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples

15.0to >12.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Sourcesor examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to providesubstance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

12.0to >9.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Sourcesor examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosento provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

9.0to >6.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Sourcesor examples meet required criteria but are poorly chosen to providesubstance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar, and style.

10.0to >8.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Projectis clearly organized, well written, and in proper essay format asoutlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; fewerrors in grammar and spelling.

8.0to >6.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Projectis fairly well organized and written, and is in proper essay format asoutlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraphstructure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0to >4.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Projectis poorly organized; does not follow proper essay format. Inconsistentto inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors ingrammar and spelling.

4.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Projectis not organized or well written, and is not in proper essay format.Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style.

5.0to >4.0 ptsMeets Expectation

Projectcontains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide toWriting and APA, with no more than one significant error.

4.0to >3.0 ptsApproaches Expectation

Fewerrors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writingand APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

3.0to >2.0 ptsBelow Expectation

Significanterrors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writingand APA, with four to five significant errors.

2.0to >0 ptsLimited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

5.0 pts

Total Points:100.0

Get your college paper done by experts

Do my question How much will it cost?

Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *