Please Answer all below listed 9 Qs from attched slide

Consider our discussion of approaches to resolving disputes.

-Define the three alternative foundations for a negotiation and explain the differences between them.

-List four factors to be used in deciding which of the alternative foundations should be used and describe each one.

-Think about your personal experience in a salary or job interview negotiation. Apply the concepts of BATNA and Reservation Price to analyze the outcome of this negotiation.

Consider our discussion of various negotiation strategies and techniques in the negotiation at Melos.

-What four strategies were available to the Melians? Analyze how each of these could have been applied by the Melian ambassador.

-Critique the Melian negotiating strategy. Would you say that their failure resulted from a poor choice of foundation, a poor choice of strategy, or other factors?

Closing and implementing the deal are key to successful negotiations.

-Define three or more key factors to consider before closing a deal. Which of these factors do you consider most important? Why?

-Consider the position of Arwa’sboss in the salary negotiation. Analyze your options for closing the deal with Arwa. What techniques would you favor? What techniques would you want to avoid?

Negotiations occur in cultural contexts.

-Consider each of the basic negotiation strategies and analyze how Saudi culture (however you choose to define it) might create advantages or disadvantages for Saudis negotiating with American counterparts.

-What guidance about strategy would you give Saudis when they negotiate with Americans? Explain your recommendations.

For this unit, watch torts in action and give an oral presentation on your findings. Go to any place of business (perhaps if you have a part-time job or an internship), or use our Lynn University campus for this assignment. Then, find FOUR potential tort issues that you see.

Next, complete a formal outline of your oral presentation, including, for each potential tort, an explanation of (1) facts and the potential injury which may occur and the specific tort which may be involved, (2) legal elements of that tort, (3) application of those elements to the facts; (4) your potential questioning of the validity of legal defenses to that tort actions.

For example, you may notice water puddling in the bathroom. Explain how a person could slip, fall and be injured. Note that injury could trigger negligence. Specify the four elements of negligence and specifically apply the elements of the tort to the facts. Complete the analysis by examining potential defenses to the tort of negligence and why that, in your opinion, would not apply. Submit that formal outline to the professor.

In class, you will present your findings in an oral presentation of 8-10 minutes, using 8-10 PowerPoint or Prezi slides. Start by completing a speaking outline for your presentation based on your findings and your formal outline. You shall be graded according to the Dialogues of Learning Oral Communication Grading Rubric, attached. This project is 15% of your grade.

It is a business communication class.

Extension Of Credit To InfoSearch

You have received a request for credit from a company called InfoSearch for online databases available from your company. You are a vendor for information databases, and subscribers to your services may contract for 12-month access to this information. You offer various service packages that provide access to specific databases. InfoSearch wants the Standard Package that allows access to a selection of your company’s available databases. The extension of credit will allow InfoSearch to order additional levels of service as needed and pay for them on a monthly basis.

Required: -Write a letter stating that credit is granted to Andrea Schmidt at InfoSearch.

-Your writing follows a sophisticated organizational pattern that demonstrates full knowledge of the topic. The topic is also linked to the intended audience. The writing has minimal disruptive grammatical errors.

– Your position and demonstration of competency exhibits sophisticated thought.

-Expertly states purpose of letter. Explains reasoning behind the letter fully, directly, and concisely.

-Expertly states course of action. Explains all essential information for action fully, directly, and concisely. Avoids letterese.

-Expertly conveys information politely. Reader is pleased to be advised of her/his chances in this manner.

-Uses a correct letter format, including heading, body, and signature

– No errors in usage, including spelling

-No palargism

Discussion E

Welcome to the final discussion. In this course you will be introduced to a topic in the discussion. The first week of the module you will write about your initial thoughts after reviewing the resources. The initial post should be at least 300 words.

During the following week you will reply to at least two of your classmates. The replies should be at least 100 words. See the discussion rubric for more details on grading.

Discussions should always be completed prior to “class.” If you are in an online class or an on ground course this is prior to the lesson portion of the week. Are you ready to begin?

1. Review the following:

Jackie Hitchcock, recently promoted to district sales manager, faced a new problem she wasn’t sure how to resolve. The district’s top sales rep is also the district’s number-one problem. Brad Coombs traditionally leads the company in sales but also leads the company in problems. He has broken every rule, bent every policy, deviated from every guideline and has been less than truthful. Jackie knew that Brad has not done anything illegal, but she was worried that something serious could happened. Other problems with Brad include not preparing call reports on time, failing to show up at trade shows, and not attending sales training programs.

2. Initial Post (300 words)

• How should Jackie handle this problem? Specifically, how can the performance evaluation process help Jackie deal with Brad?

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/30/us/tm-landry-college-prep-black-students.html (Links to an external site.)

The prompt in this assignment is based on the video or the article. Either may be used for this essay.

In one to two well reasoned, good length paragraph(s), discuss the possible racial discrimination, if any, you find that exists at this school. If you find no discrimination, discuss why you don’t believe there is any. Your discussion must be supported by at least one text reference. You may present your opinion but there must be some support from the material in this class.

Do not approach this assignment thinking that there is one chapter in the text that you can use in your discussion. It is wide opened! If you believe there is discrimination, describe it. But, you describe/discuss it in the context you choose. Is there an ethical issue? Or, maybe a tort or crime? It could possibly be a violation of the Civil Rights Act or the Constitution? It is possible you don’t see anything with the Landrys that raise any issues. Then go with that and, using any legal concept, say why not.

There is no right or wrong answer. Can you follow instructions and use your critical thinking skill to produce a credible answer is the goal:)

If you use a resource that is not the text, it will be counted as using no text reference.

Paragraph(s) content 5 points

Text reference 1 points

Spelling/grammar 1 points.