Part 1 is the notes to what the instructor left to redo the attached paper. Please redo the paper for me per the instructions and examples that the instructor left. Everything that you need is attached. The paper that need to be corrected is EDU 508 assignment 4.

Part 1

a) The header needs to be fixed as follows:

Running Head: ASSIGNMENT 4: PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER

b) Also, place the page numbering at the top.

c) Where are the rest of the required 7 to 10 required peer-reviewed summaries? I only saw 4. Help!

d) What is the name of the theory? Who developed the theory? Where are the sources supporting your statements? Did you look at the list I previously provided? Here is another copy:

Theory Framework.pdf

e) Where is your Common Themes Section?

f) Where is your Contrast Findings and Results Section?

g) I am not sure what happened, but the Research Methodology Section needed to describe the Qualitative approach you used to gather, collect, and analyze the survey questions and responses from the participants who answered the survey.

h) Why are there different subheadings pertaining to other topics and not the required for Part 2 as explained in Blackboard?

i) It appears that you submitted part of the information for this course, but perhaps part of the information for another class.

j) The paper does not meet the minimum course requirement as explained in Blackboard.

Here again, are the sample template and the PPT slides to use as a “visual” guide to organizing the paper.

Assignment 4.Great student paper.docx

Revised.Putting it all together.pptx

This is what my instructor provided..

Proposal, Paper 1

For this week, I’m asking you to write a brief proposal (no more than 250 words) in which you define what you think your topic will be for Paper 1 (the rhetorical analysis of comedy) and what direction(s) you think your analysis will take.

So, to put what I expect in bullet point form, make sure that in your proposal you address the following things. Make sure that each point gets its own paragraph (each paragraph, when you write, should contain only one main idea, topic, or part of your task), and please explain yourself fully/flesh out your ideas.

Tell me what humorous/comedic item (stand-up routine, episode of a TV show, political cartoon, meme, etc.) you want to address in Paper 1. Provide a link to it if possible.

Tell me why you’ve chosen this particular thing.

Tell me who you think the original intended audience for this piece was, how you know, and what you think you can guess or infer about that audience (who they are). Explain yourself.

Tell me what you think the creator/comedian/author intended in terms of purpose for this piece (For instance, is it satire? Political comedy? Slapstick? Explain).

Tell me if you think there’s anything controversial or questionable about this comedic item. Explain your answer, and consider how this might be influenced by the target audience.

Grading: This proposal will be worth 30 points—5 points for fully answering each of the above questions sufficiently, and 5 additional points for grammar/mechanics/spelling and paragraph structure.

HERE IS THE DOWNLOAD LINK TO THE TEXTBOOK. PLEASE READ CHAPTER 6 AND REFER TO IT FOR THE ANSWERS: https://mega.nz/#!5kpSHSwS!gc8rJapQoNmabtZk4JDTQT7DczIqSriAH2X4-8-YZZ0

PART 1

Provide a minimum of 100 words per section to address the questions below:
1-Define firm-level strategy.
2- Select a recognizable firm. Based on your observations, address the following:
a) Describe the five forces of your company’s industry based on Porter’s model
b) Identify your firm’s direct competitor.
c) Is your selected firm being offensive or defensive in their strategy?
d) As your selected firm’s competitor, how would you react specifically to their strategy?

PART 2

1-Outline steps of the strategy-making process.
2-What is a corporate-level strategy? Describe the major approaches to corporate-level strategy.
3-Identify three grand strategies, and give examples of each.
4-What is an industry-level strategy? What tools can companies use to develop successful industry-level strategies?

PART 3

Will automation take away all our jobs, by David Autor, TED (18:37 min).

Click on the link below to find the video. If the URL doesn’t work, open YouTube (or TED.com) and search for the title. Click on the ‘closed caption’ [cc] or ‘subtitle languages’ to select subtitles. View the video and provide thorough answers to the questions below:

1 – Provide examples of inventions of the last 200 years to replace labor.
2 – Explain reasons why these automations have not made human labor obsolete.
3 – Why are there so many human jobs?
4 – Define O-ring concept.
5 – Analyze the challenge that automation poses.
6 – Describe what led to highschooler movement.

http://www.ted.com/talks/david_autor_why_are_there_still_so_many_jobs

A MINIMUM of 1 original post — answering the question completely — and 2 quality student reply posts is expected. Discussion grades will be based upon BOTH the quality and quantity of posts. Simple statements like ‘good job’ or ” I agree’ without additional substantive discussion are NOT considered quality reply posts.

WARNING: Do NOT ‘copy and paste’ or ‘paraphrase’ excessively another student’s original answer. This is a form of plagiarism and will NOT be tolerated. You may refer to another student’s work in your student reply posts if proper credit is given to the original poster / student.

Who keeps the Engagement Ring?

The Facts:

• Alex (“A”) proposes marriage to Barbara (“B”)
• B accepts
• A gives B an engagement ring
• After 6 months A and B get tired of each other
• The engagement is broken off

Question:
Who keeps the ring?

1. Post your answer and explanation. Use principles you have learned in my Lecture and Text. This is not based on your opinion alone; your conclusion MUST have a basis in the Law, therefore: YOU MUST refer to the Law and legal principles (say which one(s) and where you found them PRECISELY (“in the Textbook” is not good enough)
2. Comment on a classmate postings. AGAIN – make reference to the legal principles you have learned in my Lectures, the Text and/or web based resources. YOU MUST SUPPORT YOUR ANSWER BY REFERRING TO ANY OF THESE RESOURCES; AN UNSUPPORTED ANSWER = AN AUTOMATIC “F”. Note: I am not looking for the correct answer (this is NOT Law School)… I just want a coherent answer. Do your best, make an honest effort.

Class discussion on Chapter 7 ( Requirements Analysis and Design Definition) in the BABOK.

• In your groups, use the Core Concept Model in Requirements Analysisand Design Definition and provide the following for the two newrequirements from the elicitation stage:
• Transform the elicitation results into requirement(s) to define a change.
• Analyze the need of the changes.
• List a few solution options and recommend the one that most likely addresses the need.
• Explain how the recommended solution meets the needs of the users.
• Provide at least 2 benefits supporting the change.
• Make sure all information is in context that is easily understood by all stakeholders.
• Place all this information in a traceability matrix. Research theinternet to find a traceability matrix that will house all theinformation above.
• You may need to customize a traceabilty matrix that you find on the internet or build one from scratch.
• Be sure you know what a traceability matrix is and how to use it.
• Have each group present their findings to the rest of the class.

• In your groups, work together to come up with one list on howrequirements analysis and design affects social media (Facebook,Twitter, Pintrest, Instagram,etc.).
• Be prepared to present and discuss your list to the entire class.

• Submit the traceability matrix that you built during the lesson. Be sure to include the following:
• Analysis of the need of the changes.
• A few solution options with a recommendation that most likely addresses the need.
• Explain why and how the recommended solution meets the needs of the users.
• Provide at least 2 benefits supporting the change.
• Make sure all information is in context that is easily understood by all stakeholders.