revision and peer review

Please provide a succinct (approximately 250 words) reflection below on how you incorporated feedback and/or other revisions you made to your draft. We are aware that there are many potential ways to refine your work (e.g., visiting the writing center, consulting AI editing tools) beyond the peer review process, so discuss whatever is part of your process. We recognize that not all feedback is useful, so you’re welcome to discuss that as well.

Revision comments from peer

(Paragraph 4) I think it might help your argument here if you found a primary source article that does exactly what youre describing here, such as an article about a hate crime that stereotypes a Muslim man /perpetrator as a terrorist. This would also work toward the “primary source article” part of the prompt!

(Paragraph 7) Maybe be careful here? I noticed youre using many different types of protected classes as examples, but in the footnotes of the prompt it said to focus on one status provision. I think it is probably fine to use as examples, but focus more on one if that makes sense!