response dissc

Respond to this post:

Moore and Kreth’s characterization of the workplace as inherently political resonates with certain aspects of rhetorical theory, particularly the role of language and communication in power dynamics. From a rhetorical perspective, scholars such as Kenneth Burke and Michel Foucault have explored how language and discourse shape social relations and influence power structures.

Kenneth Burke’s concept of “identification” is relevant to understanding Moore and Kreth’s QUESTION of the political nature of the workplace. Burke argues that individuals use language to create and negotiate their identities, values, and beliefs and that persuasion occurs through the identification of shared experiences and interests (Burke, 2020, p.1269). Employees and managers engage in persuasive communication to advance their agendas and interests in the workplace, often leveraging language and discourse to establish connections and exert influence.

Similarly, Michel Foucault’s theories on power and discourse shed light on the complex political dynamics within organizations. Foucault argues that power operates through discursive practices that shape and regulate behavior and that individuals and institutions use language to exercise power and control (Foucault, 2020, pp. 1450, 1453). The term ‘discursive practices’ relates to spoken or written language ranging from everyday interactions to institutional practices like an institution’s established norms and procedures. Basically, it is a fancy synonym of discourse. In the workplace, power relations are negotiated through communication practices, with specific individuals or groups exerting influence through their ability to shape discourse and control the flow of information. I have included a video link in the references that explains Michel Foucault’s theories if you still need help understanding his ideas.

With these theoretical perspectives in mind, I agree with Moore and Kreth’s assertion that the workplace is inherently political. Communication in the workplace is not simply about conveying information or solving problems through persuasion; it is also about navigating complex power dynamics and negotiating competing interests. I have seen teachers turn on teachers to get a leg up with the administration or essentially ‘play the game’ of telling their bosses what they want to hear to get in favor. As Moore and Kreth suggest, technical communicators play an essential role in this process as communication strategists who must navigate and shape political situations to achieve their goals.

However, it is crucial to recognize that the extent to which the workplace is perceived as political may vary depending on factors such as organizational culture, power structures, and individual experiences. I have noticed this in my career after working in several schools and under many different administrators.