world religion

QUESTION

CHOOSE FROM OPTION A OR B

OPTION A:

Scholars continue to debate the academic nature of Hinduism as to whether or not it is a polytheistic or monotheistic belief system. Based upon your studies and research this week, compare and contrast these two positions and then academically defend ONE SIDE of this debate by clearly demonstrating your position as to why you believe the practice of Hinduism is best identified as a polytheistic OR monotheistic belief system?

OPTION B:

A contemporary debate growing among scholars today revolves around the incredible growth of Yoga within the United States. The issue of the debate as defined by the 2011 October/November/December edition of Hinduism Today centers upon the question, “as to whether or not Yoga is intrinsically a Hindu practice or a universal science?” Based upon your studies and research this week, compare and contrast these two positions and then academically defend ONE SIDE of this debate by clearly demonstrating your position as to why you believe Yoga is best identified as an intrinsically Hindu practice OR a universal science? In your discussion, you will want to clearly identify and define what type of Yoga is being referenced and the foundational role that Yoga has in Hinduism.

“Four Questions People Ask About Hinduism … and Four Tweetable Answers 1. Is Yoga a Hindu Practice?” (2011) . Hinduism Today, October/November/December. Accessed 13 October 2018

Help with a Literay Review

Question

Write a review of literature based on the technology you are investigating for your Course Project. A review of literature may be defined as an analysis of published information in a particular subject area. It has some similarities to an annotated bibliography, which you have completed in a previous class, but differs in important respects. An annotated bibliography focuses on annotations, or summaries, of sources. In contrast, a review of literature analyzes the sources, draws connections among them, and notes changes in thinking over time. A review of literature will focus on the following questions. Must have in-text citations.

I’ve attached four of the articles from the references. Here is the website for the last reference.https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2…

What are the key points of agreement among the sources?

What are the key points of disagreement among the sources?

Do any of the sources appear to be outliers? In other words, are there any sources that bring up issues, or make assertions, that the other sources do not discuss?

  • Which sources appear to be the most powerful or influential? Are there sources that all of the other sources deem highly authoritative?
  • Are there any sources whose assertions seem dubious, illogical, or unsupported by the facts?
  • How has thinking changed about your topic over time? Are there beliefs that have fallen out of favor?
  • Demonstrate points of similarities and differences, note patterns, and evaluate source quality

follow the questions

QUESTION

1- What is the difference between the House of Wisdom and the House of Wisdom? Who among them is a product of the Abbasids?

2- Who is Al-Mansour bin Al-Hussein Al-Hallaj? What was his job? How did it end? And why?

3- It is said that the heresy appeared in the Abbasid era? What is this?

4- What is the truth about burning books and throwing them into the Tigris River by the Mongols when the Abbasid Caliphate fell?

5- What is meant by the caliph? That is, what does the word caliph mean as a definition?

6- What are the insignia of the Caliphate? Are there specific emblems representing the state to be considered a caliphate? Can any country be called a caliphate?

7-Did the caliphs receive a salary?

8– Who are the caliphs who were described as the fifth caliph? To clarify here… there are four Rightly Guided Caliphs throughout history (they are the ones who ruled the Islamic world after the death of the Messenger Muhammad (PBUH), but some caliphs appeared there after the rule of the Rightly Guided Caliphate) and were described as the fifth Caliph? Why? And who are they????

9- Why do historians disagree about the validity of this (Umayyad) caliphate in terms of the nature of rule? Some historians doubt this caliphate, while others acknowledge the right of the Umayyads to this caliphate. Why in short?

College American House of Wisdom and the House of Wisdom questions

QUESTION

1- What is the difference between the House of Wisdom and the House of Wisdom? Who among them is a product of the Abbasids?

2- Who is Al-Mansour bin Al-Hussein Al-Hallaj? What was his job? How did it end? And why?

3- It is said that the heresy appeared in the Abbasid era? What is this?

4- What is the truth about burning books and throwing them into the Tigris River by the Mongols when the Abbasid Caliphate fell?

5- What is meant by the caliph? That is, what does the word caliph mean as a definition?

6- What are the insignia of the Caliphate? Are there specific emblems representing the state to be considered a caliphate? Can any country be called a caliphate?

7-Did the caliphs receive a salary?

8– Who are the caliphs who were described as the fifth caliph? To clarify here… there are four Rightly Guided Caliphs throughout history (they are the ones who ruled the Islamic world after the death of the Messenger Muhammad (PBUH), but some caliphs appeared there after the rule of the Rightly Guided Caliphate) and were described as the fifth Caliph? Why? And who are they????

9- Why do historians disagree about the validity of this (Umayyad) caliphate in terms of the nature of rule? Some historians doubt this caliphate, while others acknowledge the right of the Umayyads to this caliphate. Why in short?

Reply of discussion

QUESTION

If this type of medication existed, even if it had a good intention of helping people forget their traumas, I would not recommend its use for all people with some trauma for two reasons. The first reason is that not all people have the same reaction to a medication. Since depending on the person, a higher or lower dose is needed for the medication to take effect, some may develop unwanted side effects, The other reason is that since its purpose is to forget traumas, this drug would work at the brain level. Which may or may not bring some collateral damage to the brain, mainly in the areas that are involved with emotions and memory. Possibly this drug inhibits or eliminates some neuronal connections related to the traumatic experience, which is not exempt from the fact that it may also affect other neuronal connections. Therefore, in my opinion, I would support this drug if it were prescribed and supervised by a professional in the neurological area with a mental health professional and used this drug in extreme cases or as a last resort. By the areas of the brain involved in the memory. In addition to the fact that there are treatments to treat trauma, some require medication that reduces the symptoms of trauma, others require therapies that help cope with the trauma.

Choose an article from the textbook and write a descriptive annotation

Question

Read ‘Descriptive Annotations’ This article explains how we will put together our skills in summarizing, quoting, and paraphrasing to write a descriptive annotation of a source. As the article explains, a good Question includes:

Information about who the author(s) of the work are and their credentials;

Summary of the work’s main points — > This is where you tell your reader what the book or article is really ABOUT;

  • Explanation of what the book or article includes in terms of charts, images, tables, or other related content;
  • Discussion of the work’s tone and writing style (this can include a brief quote from the work itself);
  • Anything else that you think someone researching the same topic would want to know about the book or article
  • In some cases, we will summarize this information, and in other instances, we will provide quotes and/or paraphrased information as examples. 2. Choose any article (reading) in CGHH (our textbook) and write a descriptive annotation that includes the five characteristics of a “good Question,” as stated in Descriptive Annotations. For example, “Two Other Options: Paraphrasing and Summarizing” (p. 384) is considered an article in our textbook. 
  • Ensure that you format your paper per MLA guidelines. You may choose any article (section of writing) from the book. For example, our textbook also has an excellent article on sentence fragments, though you can choose any article.

Descriptive Annotations: https://library.piercecollege.edu/c.php?g=418583&p…

ethics presentation

Question

name and describe in detail a key specific and recent healthcare technology. What are at least two key moral problems this technology creates? What are the proper moral guidelines for dealing with it in your view? Compare your approach to what a utilitarian and ethical egoist would say (each independently). Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.Cite the textbook and incorporate outside sources, including citations.

You should not be using any text you used in a discussion board or assignment for this class or any previous class.

Consider whether differing ethical beliefs globally might or not agree with what you say.

You will submit the following:

An audiovisual presentation that presents one of the options above. Be sure to give equal time to each element. Doing a PowerPoint presentation with audio recorded on the slides is preferred. Please refer to the Narrated PowerPoint Tutorial located in the Required Resources in this assignment.

Please provide a transcript of anything said in the recording aloud that does not appear as text on a slide. This transcript can be provided as a Word document or placed in the Notes section on the PowerPoint slides.

  • The link or a scan of the article mentioning any health technology, social technology, or case you are reporting on. If you made up the case, please indicate that in your reportRequirements

Module 7 learning

QUESTION

Your learning reflection this week will be based on Chapter 6 and Appendix B from the textbook and the following five you-tube videos: 

Provide 

thoughtful and specific responses that convey that you fully read Chapter six and watched the five videos.  

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tLLCHbCgJbM. 

https://www.nytimes.com/video/opinion/100000004308529/a-conversation-with-asians-on-race.html https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xXow7olFyIM 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=U-xz4qiUBsw

A. Chapter Six (Beyond the Mythical Norm: Considering Race, Class and Gender)

– After reading Chapter 6 and reviewing Appendix B in the textbook, select fourtopics/quotes/concepts that stood out to you and provide a thorough explanation of why it stood out to you. (Use separate paragraphs for each topic.)

B.”A Conversation with Black Women on Race”

– Share at least two insights from the video that stood out to you.  (You should have at least one paragraph for each insight.)

C. “A Conversation with Native Americans on Race”

– Share at least two insights from the video that stood out to you.(You should have at least one paragraph for each insight.)

D. “A Conversation with Latinos on Race”  

– Share at least two insights from the video that stood out to you.(You should have at least one paragraph for each insight.)

E. “A Conversation with Asian Americans on Race”

-Share at least two insights from the video that stood out to you. (You should have at least one paragraph for each insight.)

F. “A Conversation with White People on Race”two insights from the video that stood out to you.

big policy project

QUESTION

Legislative history, aka what solutions have been offered before

Take notes WHILE YOU RESEARCH: create a document where you paste links of potentially useful articles, so that you can read them later. Note dates of those articles.

You are looking for:
what government action has been taken before? Because it is PUBLIC POLICY, it has to be government (city, state, federal). [e.g. sanctuary city is the city level, contradicting federal level.

did any scientists or social scientists contribute to the debate?

What solutions by private organizations have been adopted before?

Research process:
Do you want to find the history or to write the history? To find published history: 1. Library of Congress; 2. Law Librarians’ Society Legislative Sourcebook. 3. Google; 4. Specialized paid databases (ask librarian); 5. Free access databases (see attached image for the list)

Citation:
The complete paper should have citation TWICE:
1. inside the text “according to”
2.at the end full citation: Author, Title, Publisher, Date, url. Note: for government sources, use issuing agency (house, number, session, year) for “author”

The actual paper should:

  • report what action has been proposed or taken on fixing your issue; Include dates! Are these actions federal, state, city, private organizations, wards?
  • identify who is mainly proposing solutions
  • evaluate: are these actions/policies sufficient? are they working? Why or why not?

General tips:
The tone should be civil and constructive
Legislative history is interpretive
Look for original intent

answer the following 4 question

Question

1.Short Essay Question: Provide two writing strategies that you will use to improve your literature review paper quality/paper grade. Feel free to discuss items like:

a.What you plan to do to prepare BEFORE writing your paper (like outlining your paper, seeking library help, etc.)

b. What you plan to do WHILE writing (like reading articles a few times to find the important elements, learning how to use proper APA formatting, etc.).
c. What you plan to do AFTER completing your first/final draft (like asking other people to review your paper, going to the FIU writing center, etc.).
d. Etc.

2. Short Essay Question: As you know, you are required to identify a 5th peer-reviewed and published article for Paper I. Look at the article you found (Note: If you have not found it yet, this is the friendly reminder for you to do now). Describe that article below:
a. Why did you pick the fifth article you chose?
b. How does your article link or relate to your Study One hypotheses?
c. In general, what is the article about?

3. Short Essay Question: What is your hypothesis (or hypotheses if there are more than one) for Study One? Do you agree or disagree with the hypotheses? (Note: We provided it to you!).

4. Short Essay Question: How does your paper header differ from your paper title? Give me at least two differences.