it is important that children are afforded opportunities to engage in meaningful outdoor playtime. “Research indicates that children who play outdoors demonstrate better visual motor integration, imagination, and verbal and social skills than children who play inside” (Yerkes, 1982, as quote by Bullard, 2014, pg. 360). For this reason, it is important that caregivers create quality outdoor spaces for those children in their care. For this post, you will first research grants available to assist with outdoor spaces through KorKat’s website, The Ultimate List of Playground Grants and Fundraisers (Links to an external site.).

korkat.com/playground-grants/

Then, you will use the following scenario to develop a plan for your outside space:

Imagine you are applying for one of the grants you researched. Write a 200- to 250-word proposal describing what you envision for your outdoor environment. Provide the following information:

1. Identify the grant you would most likely apply for and explain why.
2. Describe the type of playground you envision and provide a rationale for your choices (use table 17.1 in your text).
3. Discuss the S.A.F.E. (supervision, age appropriateness, fall surfacing, and equipment maintenance) precautions you must take into consideration and how this grant money would assist you in meeting these guidelines.
4. Describe how you, as the caregiver, will utilize this space with your children (e.g. how often, how will you interact with them, what developmental domains will be enhanced and why, etc.) and why providing this wonderful outdoor environment for your children is so important.

The film, Birth of a Nation (1915) is a silent film by director D.W. Griffith who pioneered film techniques and changed the way a film’s narrative told its story. Because of this, and the inclusion of some of the most famous stars of the time, the movie had a huge commercial success and was a popular film.

However, the movie is racist and unapologetic about its attitudes, which are those of a white Southerner, raised in the 19th century, unable to see African-Americans as fellow beings of worth and rights.

Another part of Birth of a Nation’s legacy is that it was successfully used as a recruiting tool for the Ku Klux Klan which had a huge resurgence due in large part because of this film.

After Watching the film and reading the articles associated with the film Week Five’s Content, answer the question below and reflect on the film.

While the film is uncomfortable at best to watch in 21^st Century America, it has an important place in the history of racism and race issues.

Answer All questions!

1. What do you think are the two most important issues for you to take away from what you have learned? Why?

1. What would be your top two talking points about this film if you were to discuss it with friends or family members? Why?

1. What recent films, TV shows, music, pieces of art address some of the same issues you talked about in questions 1 & 2? How do we/should we respond to them?

This is for a paper that needs to be corrected/edited which needs to also be reapply to correct template (attached). Please see attached docs for info. I will send you ebook details upon acceptance

————————–

A Comparison and Contrast of Two Court Rulings

I have the sign in details for my ebook upon completion.

Course Assignments https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/USW1/202010_…

For this assignment, compare and contrast two instrumental court decisions (i.e., Tarasoff v. Regents of California (1976) and Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Center (1997), both impacting confidentiality practices in the counseling profession. Discuss how the rulings impact clinical practice.

The Assignment (2–3 pages):

Compare and contrast the details of the Tarasoff v. Regents of California (1976) and Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Center (1997) court decisions. Consider how these cases may be similar or how they may be different.

Describe how the court rulings relate to confidentiality in profession of counseling. Cite appropriate ethical codes to support your narrative.

Put on a ‘counselor hat’ and discuss how the rulings might clarify or make it more difficult for you as a clinician. Reflect upon your understanding of your responsibility to maintain confidentiality with a client.

Your paper should be in proper APA format with a minimum of 2-3 scholarly references. Use the readings, additional readings, course textbook and the court cases to support your stance, or any other related references you might find.

Need approx 100-150 word response….

Many advocates of third party politics point to the lack of choices and influence with only the two parties to choose from. Some argue that the two major parties do not represent specific philosophies on issues, while others accuse them of colluding with each other and maintaining the status quo.

Visit CNN Politics.com to read the article “Two-party ‘charade’ must end, Ron Paul says” (or use the following keywords in an online search engine: Two-party ‘charade’ must end, Ron Paul says) discussing Republican Congressman Ron Paul’s support for third parties, and why he feels it is so essential for third parties to gain momentum, in light of his unsuccessful bid for the 2008 Republican Party presidential nomination.

Then search the Internet for other articles supporting more third party candidates, and consider the following questions.

• What reasons do they give for advocating a third party?
• Do you feel the current two-party system is in fact a “charade” which does not accurately reflect the changing views of the American people? Why or why not?
• Do you believe most Americans actually feel that the major party they are affiliated with truly represents their views? If not, why do you think they continue to be part of a major party?
• If you feel the current two-party system is flawed, what do you think needs to be done to address it? If you don’t think it is flawed, why do you feel it is working well?

After watching the following video on justice (Links to an external site.)narrated by Harvard philosopher professor Michael Sandel, a.) describe the deontological approach to justice and b.) state whether or not you agree with this approach with respect to this case of threatening torture, explaining your reasoning. I am looking for a one-two paragraph response.

Rubric

Online reading response rubric for case study, short writing assignment