Week 6 literature, complete a discussion response to two students, outline 3, and 3 page draft of research paper.

Question Description

Week six:

  • Turn in an outline for your third 2-page essay, and a three-page draft of your six-page research paper (this should be an adaptation of one of your essays, making it into a research paper with cited scholarly sources from the library databases supporting your argument and also providing counterarguments).
  • Read the model literature research papers in the models and templates folder (located with the syllabus and lectures in our BlackBoard classroom).

All assignments must be formatted correctly; use MLA standards for font, spacing, and margins. See the website OWL at Purdue and look up MLA format for all of the information you will need in this class. Formatting will be graded!

Discussion Guidelines:

For discussion, please post and respond to classmates as helpfully as possible as everyone revises during our final days of the term!

Expectations:

I expect you to read the assignments carefully and respond thoughtfully and in interesting ways to the reading and to one another. You should always seek to expand the conversation, and not to end it.

Some Additional Information:

This week you are outlining the final two-page essay (Essay Three), and at this point you should be feeling fairly confident about that process. Do let me know if you have questions about it, though! That will also be the final possible topic for your research paper, and the draft (three pages in length, so onto the fourth “piece of paper” in MLA format) of the research paper is also due at the end of this week.

The model research papers are your reading this week, and I hope they are helpful examples of student writing. Please bring your observations, questions, and any helpful or confusing elements up in this week’s discussion so we can make these examples as useful as possible to your writing process as you draft the research paper this week.

Have fun!

As you work through the reading and your discussion post and responses to classmates, please E-mail me with any questions and keep in touch!

Week 6 Discussion 1: Presidential Advisor

Question Description

Required Resources
Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • Textbook: Review Chapter 2, 3 (pp. 56-59), 13
  • Lesson
  • Additional scholarly sources you identify through your own research

Initial Post Instructions

You are an advisor to the President tasked with cutting at least $300 billion from the budget. The president wants your recommendations to cut lines, not large categories. Explain why you chose those cuts.

Note: These are not true US budget numbers.

DOMESTIC PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN AID

Cut some foreign aid to African countries

 $17 billion

Eliminate farm subsidies

 $14 billion

Cut pay of civilian federal workers by 5 percent

 $14 billion

Reduce the overall federal workforce by 10%

 $12 billion

Cut aid to states by 5%

 $29 billion

MILITARY

Cut the number of nuclear warheads, and end the “Star Wars” missile defense program

 $19 billion

Reduce military to pre-Iraq War size and further reduce troops in Asia and Europe

 $25 billion

Cancel or delay some weapons programs

 $19 billion

HEALTHCARE

Enact medical malpractice reform by reducing the chances of large malpractice verdicts

 $ 8 billion

Increase the Medicare eligibility age to 68

 $ 8 billion

Raise the Social Security retirement age to 68.

 $ 13 billion

EXISTING TAXES

Return the estate tax to Clinton-era levels, passing on an estate worth more than $1 million to their heirs would have portions of those estates taxed.

 $ 50 billion

End tax cuts for income above $250,000 a year

 $ 54 billion

End tax cuts for income below $250,000 a year

 $ 172 billion

Payroll tax increase for people making over $106,000 annually contributing more to Social Security and Medicare.

 $ 50 billion

NEW TAXES

Institute a Millionaire’s tax on income above $1 million

 $ 50 billion

Add a national 5% sales tax

 $ 41 billion

Add a tax on carbon emissions

 $ 40 billion

Tax banks based on their sizes and the amount of risk they take.

 $ 73 billion

Total gap covered by your budget plan

$_________________

Use evidence (cite sources) to support your response from assigned readings or online lessons, and at least one outside scholarly source.

Follow-Up Post Instructions
Respond to at least two peers or one peer and the instructor. Further the dialogue by providing more information and clarification. Minimum of 1 scholarly source, which can include your textbook or assigned readings or may be from your additional scholarly research.

Annotated Bibliography In this week, you will complete an annotated bibliography for a position paper that will be due in Week 5. Choosing what area you would like to study in addictions begins with examining the following areas related to the course comp

Question Description

Annotated Bibliography

In this week, you will complete an annotated bibliography for a position paper that will be due in Week 5. Choosing what area you would like to study in addictions begins with examining the following areas related to the course competencies:

  • Major psychological theories and principles in the field of addictions
  • Historical link to modern issues and trends in the field of addictions
  • Current and evolving trends in the field of addictions
  • Nature of geographic, social, cognitive, and emotional factors in the development, course, and duration of addictions
  • Differences in patterns of addiction in the context of gender and developmental issues
  • Illegal and legal substance use issues regarding physical, social, and psychological effects
  • Impact of treatment and prevention methods on the incidence, course, and duration of addictive behaviors

Use this as a guide when choosing research articles.

Note: This is a course on psychology. Therefore, the research should relate to addictions but from a psychological perspective and not a purely the medical related discussion on the disorders and conditions.

Choose a topic mentioned above. Using the South University Online Library database (ProQuest or EBSCOHOST), find six journal articles related to the topic. You must use scholarly journals (i.e., peer reviewed articles). You should not use web pages, magazines, newspapers, textbooks, and other books for this assignment. Also, the research articles used must be current (i.e., within the last five years).

Based on your research, create a document that includes:

  • A summary for each of the journal articles found. (i.e., 1-2 paragraphs) of the resource (e.g., What were the goals of this article? What conclusions were made? In short, provide enough details so that anyone would be able to understand the general purpose of the article.)
  • An analysis and evaluation for each of the journal articles found. (e.g., How does the information in this article correlate with information from the course? How is the information from the article similar/different from the course? WHY? What is the significance of the information from this article? HOW can this information be helpful and meaningful? WHY is this information important? HOW does the information contribute to the field of research?)

“What Can We Live Without?

Question Description

What Can We Live Without? write about “energy drinks and how it could effect our health and how we can live without it” how we can live without it and how it can affect our health

https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/historical_perspectives_on_argumentation/toulmin_argument.html

After conversations about appeals and fallacies that are found in the “texts” that surround us, and the work of Wallace, Carson, and Leopold, we’ll now turn to making our own argument, based on the Toulmin model of argument, exploring the questions: “What Can We Live Without?”

In this paper, you will

write about 5-6 Pages using simple words

  • Make an argument according to the Toulmin Model of argument answering the question “What Can We Live Without?”

To do that, you will:

  • Make a clear Claim, and expand on that through necessary points made in body paragraphs
  • Establish the Grounds for your argument
  • Understand the Warrant that connections your Claim and Grounds
  • Bring in multiple perspectives as Backing and Rebuttal, where necessary.

If you have these mapped out for class on 9/24, that would be wonderful.

Another way to approach this might be to answer one of these questions:

  • What is a habit or practice you enjoy, but might have ethical issues that are cause for concern?
  • How might your personal habits (and thus larger cultural habits) be harming the environment, and what could be done to mitigate those?

After your paper and works cited references, write a reflection where you detail your writing process for this paper, specific things you think are working well in the paper, and any challenges you had, as well as asking a question or directing me to something you’re concerned about.

Your paper should:

  • Provide an introductory paragraph that presents an idea and puts it in context.
  • Have a thesis statement that makes the purpose of the paper clear.
  • Be Organized/have a Structure advancing that thesis in at least 5 body paragraphs before concluding.
  • Summarize, paraphrase, and quote sources as needed to support your points.
  • Make sure to properly cite all your sources both in text and in a Work Cited page at the end of your paper according to MLA format.
  • Be mindful of grammar and mechanics in your writing.

Social Work writing assignment

Question Description

SOCIOECONOMIC IDENTITY. How would you describe your socioeconomic identity? How has your family’s social/economic status shaped your self-concept, values, goals, and dreams? What are the benefits of your perceived socioeconomic status? What are the costs/conflicts? How does your socioeconomic identity differ from others? How might your socioeconomic identity affect your interactions as a social worker (or chosen profession) with others of the same/different social/economic classes? What are you going to do to ensure you work effectively with those having a different socioeconomic identity?


My family helped me a lot to understand other people since I was young so that helped me now when I grew up

Because I’m from an Arab family so the society had a different ideas and me in the community where the complete opposite. Say that also I’m good with handling work with other people beliefs.

my soci economic family is a moderate economic family


Just make it simple and easy because this professor loves simplicity.


Answer each question in a paragraph and change the way of the qustion to fit the answer.

Essays should be no less than 2, no more than three pages in length and should adhere to APA formatting guidelines: 12-point font, double-spaced, one-inch margins on all sides, cover page (Running head/assigned title – centered) and page numbers on upper right hand corner. Add the reference page to the end of the paper. You do not need an abstract in the autobiographies.

Questions listed after each topic are intended to stimulate thought and do not need to be completely answered. However, students must respond to all BOLDED questions.

The point of the assignment: relate each topic to yourself. A learning tool for this process will incorporate use of the readings and videos related to the topics. You must use at least ONE APA reference in the body of your paper. Refer to Owl Purdue APA in-text citations for assistance with the format.

Each essay is worth 25 points and will be graded by the rubric listed below.

Research on Poverty (Graded Discussion)

Question Description

Write two o more paragraphs answering the following questions:

  • Share your reaction to the YouTube film “Nickel and Dimed: From the American Ruling Class.”
  • Who is Barbara Ehrenreich? Describe her research methodology. What research method did she used?
  • Can her research methodology be considered sociological? Can her research method be considered scientific? Why?

After submitting your answers, please reply to at least three (3) of our classmates’ posts, pointing out their good points as well as any limitation you see in their arguments.

Your original answer to the questions as well as your reply-comments to other students must be of substantial quality in order to get points. Substantial quality includes a demonstration that you have completed the required readings and videos and thought critically about them. Your answers and reply-comments must be original, use your own ideas and words. Do not copy from any website or written material from another person.

You must post your original answers first, in order to see other students’ answers.

Discussions Rubric

Discussions Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuestions answered

2.0 pts

Excellent

A minimum of two thoughtful paragraphs directly answering the questions.

0.0 pts

No Marks

Less than two paragraphs and/or comments did not answer the questions.

2.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequired readings/videos

3.0 pts

Excellent

Submission demonstrates comprehension of required readings and or videos.

0.0 pts

No Marks

Submission provides no relevant reference to required readings and videos.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality

3.0 pts

Excellent

Original ideas using student’s own words were presented to the class.

0.0 pts

No Marks

No original idea presented.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReply to classmates

2.0 pts

Excellent

Thoughtful reply to 3 classmates

0.0 pts

No Marks

Replied to less than 3 students and/or replies have no substantive value.

2.0 pts

Total Points: 10.0

Exceptional Needs children Unit 9 Discussion Board

Question Description

Discussion:

Chapter 13, in your text, details the characteristics of, and procedures for, School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS). You discovered that SWPBS is an “alternative to traditional reactive behavior strategies” that were based upon a “hierarchy of rules and consequences” (Shepherd & Linn, 2014, p. 266). While rules and consequences are included in SWPBS, this approach takes a “proactive, positive” approach designed to promote acceptable” behavior in all students (Shepherd & Linn, 2014, p. 266).

You also learned that there are many evidence-based social skill programs that can be incorporated into the SWPBS program. Culturally-responsive social skills programs can reduce interfering behaviors that result from cultural and linguistic differences.

Using your knowledge of School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) and evidence-based social skills programs, discuss the following:

  1. Explain how students who are at risk for behavior problems can be identified for placement in the three tiers of SWPBS. Include the following in your discussion:
    1. Office referrals
    2. Teacher nomination
    3. Continuous progress monitoring
  1. List the three assessment tools that can be used to identify students who may not exhibit externalizing behaviors but who are also at risk for behavior problems. Detail the characteristics of each assessment.
  2. Discuss “Wraparound Services” in terms of the following:
    1. Alignment with the Ecological Systems Model
    2. Those who are included in the “team”
    3. The focus of the services
    4. The advantages of using the school as an “entry point” for services

Guided Response Posts:

In your first response to a peer, list the five steps to implementing Tier 1 of School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS). Design three rules that you would implement in your classroom and the reinforcer(s) for compliance with the rules and the consequence(s) for non-compliance.

In your second response to a peer, select a social skills program (Chapter 14 of your text) that you would implement in the Behavior Education Program in Tier 2 of the School-Wide Positive Behavior Support (SWPBS) program and explain the major components of the program. Select from the following: Skillstreaming; ACCEPTS; ACCESS; Stop and Think; Replacement Behavior Training; Social Stories; or Videotherapy.

Complete Social Theory Discussion (WALDEN)

Question Description

USE THE CASE STUDY OF JAKE

Discussion: Using Research to Select a Therapeutic Modality

Imagine that some of your colleagues mention using cognitive behavior therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and reality therapy. Your colleagues continue to say that based on their experiences, they really like these therapies and that they appear to work. Your instincts also tell you that perhaps they might be helpful for your client in your case study. However, from Week 1, you recall that experiences and instincts as sources of knowledge are quite limited because they are biased. Instead, it is important to utilize existing research and data to support your choices of interventions. Theory helps inform the evidence-based practice process that should guide social workers’ practice.

In this Discussion, you examine the research related to a therapy based on cognitive or cognitive behavior theory to determine its effectiveness.

To prepare:

  • Recall the client from the case study you have been using in this course. You will apply your research for this Discussion to that client.
  • Select one therapy from the following: cognitive behavior therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, or reality therapy.
  • Conduct a search in the Walden Library for one peer-reviewed research study about the effectiveness of the therapy you selected.
    • Note: You must select a study that has not already been used by a colleague in the Discussion. Each student is required to identify a unique research study.
  • Remember when looking for studies to take into account your client’s age and developmental stage and presenting problem.

By Day 3

Post:

  • Provide the reference for the study you found using APA guidelines.
  • Briefly paraphrase, in 2 to 3 sentences, the methodological context (i.e., research method, how data was collected, and the instruments used) of the study and the findings.
  • Evaluate the findings in terms of its applicability or appropriateness for the client in your case study.
  • Determine whether you would use or not use the therapy you selected for the client in your selected case study (consider how culturally relevant it is, how aligned it is with social work ethics, etc.) and explain why.

COMPLETE NATIONAL GOVERNMENT 1000 Essay (LAVERN)

Question Description

The course concept essay should be 1000 words in length and is to be on one of the below topics/concepts. Please use only one of the 4 topics below. You should write a paper about one of the 4 topics below that explain what the topic/concept is and then provide a corresponding example. Be sure to write arguments for and against the topic, not your example. Please use the rubric below. This is to be turned in via Canvas on Oct 4th and will not be accepted via email or in person.

Democracy

Interest Groups

The Presidency (in general; not President Trump’s term)

Congress

This is a research paper (not an op-ed/opinion paper) and must include a minimum of 10 citations (i.e. MLA, Endnotes, or Footnotes), and a bibliography/works-cited/reference page. Please do not include any textbooks or encyclopedias (including Wikipedia) in your bibliography, as they are not appropriate as reference sources for college level papers. Please Please Please email me if you have any concerns.

The paper MUST be typed, double- spaced, and in Times New Roman – #12 font. Cover pages and bibliographies will not count toward the word count requirement.

Please format according to A.P.A., M.L.A., or the Chicago Style format. Please visit the Learning Commons for assistance with this.

A quality paper will contain these parts:

1) Statement of the concept/topic. Ex. Separation of Powers

2) Statement of the current event. Ex. Donald Trump overreaching

3) Explain how the concept relates to a current event. Ex. Pres. Trump has tried to appropriate funds

4) Primary arguments in favor of the concept/topic-please cite. Primary arguments for opposing the concept/topic-please cite.

5) Your opinion on the arguments of both sides.Your rationale/logic for reaching this conclusion.

This is not an opinion piece, please do not make this entire piece about your views-you will receive a zero. If you write about a topic other than one of the 4 topics listed above, you will receive a zero. Also, points will be deducted for poor: grammar, content, and spelling. If this assignment is completed incorrectly, you will receive a zero-no partial credit.

Gender and Identity Discussion

Question Description

THE DISCUSSION

The theory of Social Constructionism ismost applicable in helping us to understand how gender and sexuality issocially constructed. In your textbook it states it is a way ofunderstanding social reality that is influenced by our thinking which isthen reinforced by our interactions with others in our environment. Italso helps us to better discuss the social order that contributes towhy we believe and/or engage with sexuality the way we do (Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman, 2016). Forexample, the Bureau of Justice Statistics (2015) confirmed interviewswith over 150,000 people ages 12 and up that reported being raped and/orsexually assaulted in 2014. If we ask an age old question “why doesrape occur” what kinds of responses can you imagine different peoplesaying? Why might people respond they way they do? The differentresponses to that question and the various reasons why they respond theyway they do are reflections of the social constructions of gender andsexuality. Ideally, think about what this knowledge means in light ofworking against issues such as sexism, sexual harassment, and sexualdiscrimination.

After having read the required materials for this week and watched the documentary address the following questions:

Select two locations in the documentary and briefly discuss how gender is viewed in those two cultures (in other words what are the prevailing views about gender based on each location).

Using social constructionist theory as your framework, briefly, discuss the ways in which culturally prevailing views about gender impact healthy development of individuals living in the two locations you identified in the first question?

As based on your observations of the documentary, highlight one piece of information you already knew and one piece of information you learned about the topic of gender and/or sexuality as a whole.How and in what ways does this information shift your thinking and why?

*Be sure to cite your discussion with your textbook and an outside scholarly source and provide references.

Zastrow, C., & Kirst-Ashman, K. (2015). Understanding human behavior and the social environment (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Gyoq6tdlsE