Please respond to the following ECO 550 Discussion Week 12 Managerial Economics Problem Set 4
Question Description
ECO 550 Discussion Week 12 Managerial Economics Problem Set 4 work all of PROBLEM OUT.
ECO 550 Discussion Week 12 Managerial Economics Problem Set 4 work all of PROBLEM OUT.
Exercise 2 [20 marks]
Consider a woman, Jane, who runs a small business providing legal services, in particular she reviews property sale contracts.
She charges her clients $10 per contract reviewed.
The table below shows some points on her production function relating how many hours she works to the number of contracts reviewed.
Hours 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Contracts 0 12 23 33 42 50 57 63 68 72 75 77
a) Draw her production function showing how hours work is related to contracts reviewed (either on paper or in Excel). [1 mark] b) Explain why her marginal product for her 10th hour is different from her marginal product of her 1st hour. [3 marks] c) Assume that Jane requires a minimum of 14 hours per day for sleep and daily tasks such as looking after children, so these are not available for work or free time. It is only the remainder that she can choose to work or have free time. Draw her feasible set showing the income and free time that she could achieve each day. [3 marks] d) Would her optimal choice be 4 hours of free time and $500 income? Explain. [2 marks] e) What is the opportunity cost to Jane of increasing from 2 hours free time to 3 hours free time? [1 mark] f) Select an optimal choice of free time and income, and draw an indifference curve through that point. [2 marks] g) Draw additional indifference curves above and below the indifference curve in (f) and use them to explain why the point in (f) must be optimal for Jane. [4 marks] h) Explain how the Marginal Rate of Substitution (MRS) and the Marginal Rate of Transformation (MRT) must be related to each other at the optimal choice, and why. [4 marks]
Week 10 Assignment: Investing in My Future (170 points)
Finance is exciting! In this course, we learned how money can grow through the use of compounding and interest rates and your growth strategies may now be different. What are your new financial goals? Would you like to become more liquid, to save more for your retirement, or to start a new business? Whatever your goals, finance is right at the core. Think about what you learned in this course regarding investing to complete this assignment.
Write a two to three (2-3) page paper in which you:
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
Use the submitted paper to help u get the information for doing this handout.
Example is given
Requirements
I want from you to do an economic research paper
these are some of the instructions
“Create research questions based on a topic covered in class that interest you. Research and find answers to those questions by using articles from current or past events from any major publication (electronic or print edition) to be your research references. Articles that appear in economic journals or business magazines such as The Economist are good resources. In addition, articles that appear in blogs or newspapers are good sources for further research. Several links to good references are available under the Content and the Announcement section on the class website as well as a sample and guildlines for your research.
The objective of the paper is to summarize, analyze, critique, support (or question) the articles, and relate the articles to your research questions. The paper must show an analysis of a real world situation using economics concepts, framework, and theories to suggest such as what the problems are, why there are the problems, how to fix the problems, what the pros and cons of each solution are, and how it will affect each group of people.
“”
Very Important:!
About the topic I’ve attached a file that has more instructions and topics, choose one of the topics and follow the instructions.
I’ve attached the rubric please match the rubric exactly.
Written Case Analysis
They may take the form of a memorandum to your supervisor but the exact format of the analysis is up to the team.The analysis must be two pages long not including the cover page, with one-inch margins at all sides, 12-point Times New Roman font and one-and-a half spaced.The cover page should contain the name of the case, the number of your team, and the names of the team members.You may include up to three exhibits as additional pages.Longer submissions will be returned unread for revision.The case analysis is due on the date indicated on the Blackboard post (at midnight).Your write-up should be uploaded to Blackboard in the appropriate dropbox. Your file should be labeled as CaseStudy#_teamX
The case should contain the following elements:
In most of the cases there is not “one correct” answer/problem/challenge.Hence, I place emphasis on how well you justify/argue your position base on your criteria (e.g. economic principles, or objectives of business strategy, development goals, etc.)
2-page (maximum, double-spaced) reaction papers
There will be 2 such assignments, the purpose of which is to get you to think clearly and concisely about
a particular subject. They will be due on this schedule:
1. Due September 20: a short paper offering your critical reactions to either the Rodrik paper or the
Noland paper (or both if you prefer to compare them) that we will discuss in class on September
16.
2. Due November 8: a short paper offering your critical reactions to the paper by Autor, Dorn, and
Hanson (ADH) that we will discuss in class on October 28 or 30.
In preparing these papers you should read the article(s) carefully and with a critical eye. State clearly the
question or questions the author is addressing, review briefly how s/he performed the analysis (that is,
verbal argument, theory, empirical analysis), and the primary conclusion or conclusions reached. Then
offer your opinion (try to base it on economic reasoning or shortcomings in the analysis) of the article. If
you think it’s excellent or well done, say so. But see if you can spot holes in the argument or analysis,
find questions that are missing from it, or elements that you think could have been done better. Are the
conclusions really supported by the analysis?
I recognize that the authors are professional economists, and these are famous papers, so finding such
shortcomings may not be easy. But there are not necessarily right or wrong answers here. I really am just
asking you to read the article(s) and offer your own observations. You could think of these as practice
exercises in writing short memos explaining the work to colleagues in a government agency or
international organization.
I prefer that you print your papers and give them to me in class instead of emailing them.
Directions:
Directions:
1a. Suppose the marginal cost of a television set is $100. This is constant and equal to the average cost
of television sets. The annual demand for television sets is given by the following equation: Q= 200,000-
500P, where Q is the quantity sold per year and P is the price of the television sets. Is the television sets
are sold in a perfectly competitive market, calculate the annual number sold. Under what circumstances
will the market equilibrium be efficient?
1b. Show the losses in well-being each year that would result from a law limiting sales of television sets
to 100,000 per year. Show the effect on the price, marginal social benefit, and marginal social cost of
television sets. Show the net loss in well-being that will result from a complete ban on the sales of
television sets.
2. A prominent senator has calculated the total social benefit of the current amount of space
exploration at $3 billion per year. The total social cost of space exploration is currently only $2 billion.
The senator argues that a net gain to society would result by increasing the amount of space exploration
until social costs rise enough to equal total benefits. Is the senator’s logic correct?
3. The market equilibrium price for rice in Japan would be $3 per pound in the absence of government
subsidies to rice production. However, the government sets the price of rice at $5 per pound and agrees
to buy all the rice produced by farmers at that price. Assume that points on the demand curve for rice
equal the marginal social benefit of alternative quantities, while points on an upward-sloping supply
curve equal the marginal cost of various quantities. Show how the subsidy program will result in loss in
efficiency.
We provide reliable and top-quality writing services with a great balance of affordability and professionalism with all types of academic papers.